AI Automatic Harvest Sorting and Quality Assessment System

We design and deploy artificial intelligence systems: from prototype to production-ready solutions. Our team combines expertise in machine learning, data engineering and MLOps to make AI work not in the lab, but in real business.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1566 services
AI Automatic Harvest Sorting and Quality Assessment System
Medium
~1-2 weeks
FAQ
AI Development Areas
AI Solution Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    823
  • image_logo-aider_0.jpg
    AIDER company logo development
    762
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    848

AI Harvest Sorting and Quality Assessment System

An optical sorter on grain elevator takes 15 images of each grain in 2 ms and makes rejection decision faster than human blink. This is one of few cases in agro-CV where computer vision has worked in production 20 years—even with classical algorithms. Today's task: raise accuracy, reduce false rejects, predict internal defects.

CV Method Stack by Product Type

Sorting tasks differ radically by product:

Grain and Legumes (High Speed, Unit Processing)

Conveyor optical sorters work at 5–15 t/h. Each grain photographed in RGB + near-IR. Inference must fit in < 3 ms per object. Architecture—light classification network (MobileNetV2 or EfficientNet-Lite0) with INT8 quantization on NVIDIA Jetson or FPGA (Xilinx Zynq).

Wheat grain defect classes: broken, shriveled, sprouted, fusarium-affected, green, crop contaminant. Inter-class confusion—shriveled vs normal under non-standard light. Solution: white reference normalization before each batch + lighting augmentation during training.

Fruits and Vegetables (Appearance + Internal Defect Prediction)

External sorting by size, color, shape—task for classical CV plus detection. More interesting—NIR spectroscopy for non-destructive internal quality: dry matter (°Brix), apple internal browning, hollowness. One NIR sensor (Zeiss Corona 45 NIR or Carl Zeiss MCS 600) + calibration PLS regression—standard on production lines.

Modern approach: hyperspectral camera (400–1700 nm) above conveyor. Each apple receives full spectrum, CNN with 1D-spectral branch predicts °Brix with RMSE=0.6 and internal browning with 0.91 accuracy (vs 0.79 for PLS).

Deep Dive: Potato Sorting

Practical case. Client—potato processor, 8 t/h line. Task: auto-sort into 4 classes (extra / first / second / technical) by combined features.

Features: weight (load cell), size (3D scanner or stereo camera), green areas, eye count and depth, mechanical damage, rot.

Solution architecture:

  • YOLOv8m-seg for potato segmentation and defect detection
  • Separate regression head for size estimation from mask
  • Fuse with weight sensor and color features
  • Gradient Boosting for final classification decision across all features

Result: GOST R 51808 standard compliance 94.3% vs 78% prior mechanical screening. False "class downs"—3.1% (important: underestimate costlier than overestimate).

Metric Before After
Classification Accuracy 78% 94.3%
Throughput 8 t/h 8 t/h
False Class Downs ~12% 3.1%
Manual Control 2 operators 0.5 operator

Integration into Production Line

System works linked with PLC (Siemens S7 / Allen-Bradley) via PROFINET or OPC UA. Rejection air valve command arrives < 5 ms after inference. Conveyor speed—from line controller, CV syncs by encoder.

Deploy: NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin for heavy models (potato, fruit) or Jetson Orin NX for grain. TensorRT engine, FP16 for accuracy or INT8 for critical speed needs.

Implementation Process

  1. Line technical survey, identify imaging and lighting points
  2. Data collection under production lighting, annotation (500+ samples per defect class)
  3. Train and validate on held-out set
  4. Integrate with PLC, test at real conveyor speed
  5. Calibrate rejection thresholds with technologist
  6. Monitor accuracy in production, retrain on variety/batch change

Timeline

System for one product type (grain or fruit): 6–10 weeks. Complex line with NIR module and ERP integration: 3–5 months.