Custom Image Classifier: From Imbalanced Data to Production

Manual image moderation can't keep up with the data flow, and off-the-shelf models don't account for your catalog's specifics. We build turnkey image classification systems: we train neural networks on your data, select the architecture, and tune it for class imbalance. Our team delivers from audit to API deployment and provides ongoing support, ensuring the solution works reliably and scales with your business.

AI Development Areas

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • Development of a web application for FEEDME
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1344
  • Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1306
  • B2B Advance company logo design
    B2B Advance company logo design
    753
  • Development of a web application for Enviok
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1049
  • AIDER company logo development
    AIDER company logo development
    991
  • CRM development for Chasseurs
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1097

Custom Image Classifier: From Imbalanced Data to Production

You're deploying a model for a product catalog and get macro-F1 = 0.72 due to severe class imbalance. Recently, an e-commerce project approached us with a dataset of 15,000 images, 30 categories, where 80% belonged to five classes. We applied Weighted Random Sampler and Focal Loss, boosting macro-F1 from 0.72 to 0.94 in two weeks. The key challenge is not the model itself (standard benchmarks are passed), but adaptation to the specific domain: noise in labeling, lighting variations, incomplete data.

We also tackled a medical diagnostic project requiring detection of rare pathologies in MRI scans. The imbalance was even more severe: 99% healthy, 1% diseased. Combining oversampling, augmentation, and focal loss, we achieved sensitivity of 0.92 at specificity of 0.98. Projects start at $3,000 and vary based on complexity.

Which Architecture to Choose?

For most tasks, we select EfficientNet-B4 or ConvNeXt-Tiny: they offer a good balance of accuracy and inference time. EfficientNet-B4 is 2x faster than ViT-B/16 with comparable accuracy. The table below compares popular architectures.

Architecture Top-1 ImageNet Parameters Latency (T4 GPU)
EfficientNet-B0 77.1% 5.3M 3.5 ms
EfficientNet-B4 82.9% 19M 9.2 ms
ConvNeXt-Tiny 82.1% 28M 7.8 ms
ViT-B/16 81.8% 86M 12.1 ms
EfficientNet-B7 84.4% 66M 28 ms

For edge devices (Raspberry Pi, Jetson Nano), we use MobileNetV3 or EfficientNet-Lite – they run in 1–2 ms on CPU.

Why Fine-Tuning Beats Training from Scratch?

Training from scratch requires millions of labeled examples. Fine-tuning a pretrained model yields excellent results with just hundreds of images per class. This approach is described in Wikipedia: Transfer Learning. We also leverage contrastive learning and knowledge distillation to further improve performance.

import timm
import torch.nn as nn

def build_classifier(num_classes: int, pretrained_model: str = 'efficientnet_b4'):
    model = timm.create_model(
        pretrained_model,
        pretrained=True,
        num_classes=0
    )
    embedding_dim = model.num_features  # 1792 for B4
    for param in model.parameters():
        param.requires_grad = False
    classifier = nn.Sequential(
        nn.Linear(embedding_dim, 512),
        nn.GELU(),
        nn.Dropout(0.3),
        nn.Linear(512, num_classes)
    )
    model.classifier = classifier
    return model

Fine-tuning strategy step by step:

  1. Freeze backbone, train only classifier for 5 epochs.
  2. Unfreeze last 2 blocks, train for 10 epochs with LR 10x lower.
  3. Full unfreezing, another 10 epochs with cosine schedule.
  4. Evaluate on validation: if metrics are not met, repeat with different hyperparameters.
Common mistake: not training batch norm layers When partially unfreezing, keep batch norm layers in train mode – otherwise statistics don't update and accuracy drops by 5–10%.

How to Handle Class Imbalance?

Real datasets are rarely balanced. We combine several techniques:

  • Weighted random sampler – sampling frequency inversely proportional to class size.
  • Focal Loss – focuses on hard examples (γ=2).
  • Oversampling rare classes via data augmentation (albumentations).
  • Class-weighted cross-entropy – weights 1/class_frequency.

This approach lifts macro-F1 by 15–20% compared to baseline training. Order a pilot project – we'll show results on your data within two weeks.

Difference Between Multi-Class and Multi-Label Classification

Multi-class: one class per image – softmax + cross-entropy (e.g., animal type). Multi-label: multiple classes simultaneously – sigmoid + binary cross-entropy (e.g., photo tags). The threshold for each class is tuned separately based on F1.

Model Quality Metrics

  • Top-1/Top-5 Accuracy for balanced sets.
  • Macro-averaged F1 for imbalanced sets.
  • Cohen's Kappa for medical tasks.
  • AUC-ROC per class for multi-label.

Work Process for Classification System

Analysis → design → implementation → testing → deployment. In the first stage, we study your dataset, identify problematic classes, assess labeling quality. Then we select architecture and run a series of A/B experiments with hyperparameters. After model approval – export to ONNX, containerization, and deployment into your infrastructure. All steps are documented, your engineers receive access to the model and operating instructions. Contact us to get a cost estimate and roadmap for your project.

Timelines

Task Complexity Timeline
2–10 classes, 1000+ photos/class 1–2 weeks
50+ classes or complex domain 3–5 weeks
Hierarchical classification, edge deployment 5–8 weeks

Cost is determined after analysis – contact us for a detailed estimate.

What's Included?

  • Data analysis and dataset preparation.
  • Architecture selection and fine-tuning (with A/B config tests).
  • Quality evaluation per chosen metrics (report).
  • Deployment as REST API or integration into your infrastructure.
  • Documentation and team training.
  • Guarantee – if accuracy does not meet agreed targets, we rework for free.

With years of experience, we have completed over 40 image classification projects for e-commerce, medical, and industrial domains. Our engineers hold certifications from NVIDIA, AWS, and Google Cloud, and use MLOps practices for experiment reproducibility. We guarantee achieving target metrics – if accuracy is below the agreed level, we rework for free. Contact us to discuss your project and get a preliminary timeline estimate.