AI Carbon Footprint Calculation System

We design and deploy artificial intelligence systems: from prototype to production-ready solutions. Our team combines expertise in machine learning, data engineering and MLOps to make AI work not in the lab, but in real business.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1566 services
AI Carbon Footprint Calculation System
Medium
~2-4 weeks
FAQ
AI Development Areas
AI Solution Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    823
  • image_logo-aider_0.jpg
    AIDER company logo development
    762
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    848

AI-based carbon footprint calculation system

Scope 3 emissions account for 70–90% of a typical company's carbon footprint. Calculating them accurately without automation is impossible: Scope 1 (purchased goods and services) requires data from hundreds of suppliers, while Scope 11 (usage of sold products) requires an understanding of customer consumption patterns. Manual calculations performed annually yield an error of 35–50%. The ML pipeline calculates continuously with an error of 12–20%.

Architecture of the calculation engine

Hierarchy of calculation methods

The GHG Protocol allows three methods for Scope 3 Category 1:

Метод Точность Требования к данным
Spend-based ±40% Расходы + EEIO факторы
Average-data ±25% Вес/объём закупок + emission intensity
Supplier-specific ±10% PCF данные от поставщика

Machine learning task: automatically select the best available method for each procurement line and calculate the emission factor. The classifier (LightGBM) determines the method based on available data. If the supplier has a PCF, it uses supplier-specific. If there is a weight, it uses average-data. Otherwise, it uses spend-based pricing with EXIOBASE 3.8 EEIO tables.

Parsing of invoices and documents

80% of activity data comes in the form of PDF invoices. Document AI pipeline: - LayoutLMv3 (Microsoft) — a multimodal model for structured extraction from documents - Extracted fields: supplier_name, line_item_description, quantity, unit, unit_price, total - NER + classification by HS code (Harmonized System) → emission factor lookup - Extraction accuracy: 93% on a test dataset of invoices from 8 industries

Deployment: Azure Form Recognizer or self-hosted TorchServe. Processing 10,000 documents per day on 2×A10G GPUs, latency of 1.8 seconds per document.

Calculation of Scope 1 and Scope 2

Scope 1: Direct Emissions

Sources: fuel combustion (boilers, generators, corporate vehicles), industrial processes (welding, chemical reactions), refrigerant leaks (F-gases). SCADA/EMS integration: fuel consumption from meters → multiplication by IPCC AR5/AR6 emission factors.

ML anomaly: if boiler gas consumption on a weekend is >150% of the average weekend for the previous year, trigger an alert. LSTM Autoencoder on hourly data, trained on two years of normal readings.

Scope 2: Purchased Energy

Location-based method: kWh consumption × regional emission factor (IEA, Ember, AIB for Europe). Market-based: Guarantees of Origin (GO), RECs, and Power Purchase Agreements are subtracted from the calculation.

Automation: integration with energy supply companies' personal accounts (API or web scraping) for monthly consumption data updates without manual input.

Forecasting and scenario analysis

Net-zero pathway modeling

The company's SBTi (Science Based Targets Initiative) goal is to reduce Scope 1+2 by 46% by 2030. ML component: time-series forecasting (Temporal Fusion Transformer) baseline emissions + scenario analysis: - Business as usual - Renewables transition (solar/wind PPA) - Fleet electrification (EV conversion schedule) - Supplier engagement (top 20 emissions → PCF data requirement)

For each scenario: NPV of decarbonization investments vs. cost of carbon (EU ETS price + regulatory risk).

Internal carbon pricing

The shadow carbon price ($50–150/tCO2e) is applied to investment decisions. The ML module automatically calculates the carbon cost for capex projects from ERP data (equipment → lifecycle emissions according to the Ecoinvent database).

Integration with carbon markets

Carbon credit verification: offset quality check using the Gold Standard, VCS (Verra) database. The ML classifier assesses double-counting and permanence risks of forestry projects (satellite imagery + forest degradation using NDVI time series).

Automatic registry accounting: API integration with Xpansiv CBL, Gold Standard Registry for tracking retire/cancel transactions with credits.

Stack

Storage: Snowflake with dbt transformations for the ESG model. Computation: Python (pandas, pyCO2SYS for marine emissions). ML: scikit-learn, LightGBM, PyTorch for time-series. Document AI: LayoutLMv3, Hugging Face Transformers. Orchestration: Apache Airflow.

Development time: 3–6 months for the basic calculation engine with automatic data import. Full Scope 1-2-3 with document AI and scenario analysis: 6–10 months.