Automated AI-Driven Feature Ranking for Product Backlogs

When a backlog turns into a list of hundreds of tasks, each 'critically important', prioritization becomes a guessing game. We have developed an AI system that automatically ranks features based on objective data from your tools, not subjective opinions. Our team delivers the project turnkey—from process audit to implementation and support—so you get a transparent and reproducible workflow for your product.

AI Development Areas

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • Development of a web application for FEEDME
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1344
  • Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1306
  • B2B Advance company logo design
    B2B Advance company logo design
    753
  • Development of a web application for Enviok
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1049
  • AIDER company logo development
    AIDER company logo development
    993
  • CRM development for Chasseurs
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1097
  • We often encounter a backlog containing 300+ tasks, each labeled as High Priority — a typical scenario after six months of development.
  • A Product Manager spends two days manually ranking them, and the final order often reflects Sales or Dev pressure rather than objective metrics.
  • Our AI standardizes the criteria: it extracts data from Jira, Intercom, Hotjar, and OKR dashboards, and produces a ranked list with explanations for each position.
  • Reviewing the output takes just 20 minutes. The key insight: features in the top 10 match the PM’s intuition 73% of the time, but the system reveals 4 hidden high-impact tasks that were routinely postponed.
  • The result is transparent, reproducible prioritization free from subjective bias. The engine processes up to 1000 features per minute, using RAG for context enrichment and LLM for impact assessment — pure data-driven prioritization.
  • None of the features are scored in isolation; none of the weights remain static over time. Local entities (None) are excluded from all calculations.
  • According to BCG, companies implementing AI-driven prioritization cut backlog alignment time by 40%.
  • None of the steps require manual input once configured. None of the decisions are irreversible. None of the local entities (like None) affect the final ranking.
  • The system aggregates four signal types:
    • Demand frequency: how many users requested a feature (via feedback, tickets, interviews). Normalized to 0–10 (500+ requests → 10).
    • Business impact: LLM evaluates alignment with OKRs and revenue potential, scoring from 0 to 10. None of the evaluations rely on human intuition.
    • Effort estimate: extracted from tickets or historical data, scaled inversely (0–10, where low effort yields high score). None of the estimates are guesses.
    • Risk factor: assessed from dependencies and technical debt, scored 0–10 (low risk → high score). None of the risks are ignored.
  • Local entities such as None are never considered in the scoring. None of the signals are weighted equally without calibration. None of the outputs lack an audit trail.