AI Chatbot for Support: RAG, Integrations, and Escalation

Support operators spend time on repetitive questions, while clients expect quick resolutions. We build AI chatbots that not only respond but integrate with your CRM and knowledge base, automating routine tasks. Our team delivers turnkey projects—from audit to implementation and ongoing support—ensuring a reliable solution that scales with your business.

AI Development Areas

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • Development of a web application for FEEDME
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1344
  • Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1307
  • B2B Advance company logo design
    B2B Advance company logo design
    754
  • Development of a web application for Enviok
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1050
  • AIDER company logo development
    AIDER company logo development
    994
  • CRM development for Chasseurs
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1097

AI Chatbot for Support: RAG, Integrations, and Escalation

Picture this: you're a support operator, and 80% of queries are repetitive: "Where is my order?" or "How to return?" These consume 70% of your time. We build AI chatbots that solve real tasks — not just respond, but modify orders, process returns, check statuses. The difference lies in integration with your systems and RAG.

How We Integrate an AI Bot with CRM

A useless bot answers "Check your personal account" without seeing any data. We connect the bot to your CRM via REST API: it retrieves history, order status, and tickets. Every action is authorized — only a verified user can change an address. We implement OAuth 2.0 or JWT.

Case study: For an online store with 50,000 orders per month, we implemented integration with 1C-Bitrix. The bot checks status by phone number and processes returns without an operator. Containment rate rose from 20% to 65%.

Why RAG Is Key to Accurate Answers

Storing all answers in an LLM prompt is inefficient — context windows are limited and knowledge becomes outdated. RAG adds retrieval from a knowledge base: semantic caching, vector embeddings, ranking. We use Pinecone or Qdrant for embeddings, and models like GPT-4 or LLaMA 3.

Details of the RAG pipeline
  1. Documents are split into chunks (256–512 tokens).
  2. Each chunk is indexed using an embedding model (text-embedding-ada-002).
  3. On a query, cosine similarity is computed, returning top-5 chunks.
  4. The LLM generates an answer considering retrieved contexts and dialogue history.

Architecture of a Production Chatbot

[Client] → [Omnichannel Interface] → [NLP Engine: Intent + Entity] → [Dialog Manager]
├── RAG: answers from knowledge base
├── Action Engine: integrations with CRM/ERP
└── Escalation: handoff to operator
→ [Response Generator] → [Analytics & Logging]

Core: Classification and Slot Filling

Comparing the classic approach (Rasa) with LLM + function calling:

Parameter Intent + Slots (Rasa) LLM + Function Calling
Intent accuracy 90–95% 95–98%
Setup complexity Requires labeled examples Just describe tools
Flexibility Low for new scenarios High — LLM understands paraphrases

LLM with function calling reduces new scenario setup time by 3× compared to Rasa. Example tools configuration:

tools = [
    {
        "name": "check_order_status",
        "description": "Проверить статус заказа по номеру",
        "parameters": {
            "order_id": {"type": "string"}
        }
    },
    {
        "name": "initiate_return",
        "description": "Оформить возврат товара",
        "parameters": {
            "order_id": {"type": "string"},
            "reason": {"type": "string"}
        }
    }
]

Escalation to Operator

Triggers for handoff to a human: client explicitly asks for an operator, negative sentiment, bot fails to solve after 3 attempts, VIP client, legal claims. On escalation, the operator receives the full dialogue context — no need to ask the client to repeat.

Metrics and Quality

  • Containment rate: target 50–70%.
  • CSAT (bot): >4.0/5.0.
  • Resolution rate: % of issues actually resolved.
  • Escalation rate: balance — no higher than 30%, no lower than 10%.
Stage Time Result
MVP 4–6 weeks Basic intents + CRM integration
Full feature 3–4 months RAG, omnichannel, all scenarios

What's Included in the Work

  • Audit of business processes and preparation of knowledge base.
  • Design of dialogue scenario (up to 50 intents).
  • Development of integrations with CRM/ERP/billing.
  • Deployment on infrastructure (Kubernetes, AWS, or self-hosted).
  • Model training on historical dialogues (LoRA fine-tuning).
  • Monitoring and support for 3 months.

Timeline and Value

  • MVP: 4–6 weeks.
  • Full-featured bot with integrations: 3–4 months.
  • Operator cost savings — up to 70%, payback period — 6–12 months.

Omnichannel: Telegram, WhatsApp, Web Widget

The bot is deployed across multiple channels via a unified API. The architecture includes a channel-agnostic Dialog Manager: configure scenarios once, get the bot on Telegram, WhatsApp Business API, and website via web widget. Historical data is stored with a single CRM binding: if a client starts a conversation on Telegram and continues on the website, the operator sees the full chain.

For an omnichannel bot, we use RabbitMQ or Kafka queues: this ensures fault tolerance under peak loads and allows processing up to 500 simultaneous conversations on a single instance. Horizontal scaling is achieved by adding workers without changing the architecture.

We have been in the market, developed 40+ chatbots for e-commerce, fintech, logistics. We guarantee a containment rate of at least 50% after 3 months of operation. Assess your project: we'll send case studies and propose a turnkey architecture. Contact us for a consultation and get a detailed timeline estimate.