AI Chatbot for Support: RAG, Integrations, and Escalation

AI Chatbot for Support: RAG, Integrations, and Escalation

AI Development Areas

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1285
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1241
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    696
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    982
  • image_logo-aider_0.webp
    AIDER company logo development
    919
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1033

AI Chatbot for Support: RAG, Integrations, and Escalation

Picture this: you're a support operator, and 80% of queries are repetitive: "Where is my order?" or "How to return?" These consume 70% of your time. We build AI chatbots that solve real tasks — not just respond, but modify orders, process returns, check statuses. The difference lies in integration with your systems and RAG.

How We Integrate an AI Bot with CRM

A useless bot answers "Check your personal account" without seeing any data. We connect the bot to your CRM via REST API: it retrieves history, order status, and tickets. Every action is authorized — only a verified user can change an address. We implement OAuth 2.0 or JWT.

Case study: For an online store with 50,000 orders per month, we implemented integration with 1C-Bitrix. The bot checks status by phone number and processes returns without an operator. Containment rate rose from 20% to 65%.

Why RAG Is Key to Accurate Answers

Storing all answers in an LLM prompt is inefficient — context windows are limited and knowledge becomes outdated. RAG adds retrieval from a knowledge base: semantic caching, vector embeddings, ranking. We use Pinecone or Qdrant for embeddings, and models like GPT-4 or LLaMA 3.

Details of the RAG pipeline
  1. Documents are split into chunks (256–512 tokens).
  2. Each chunk is indexed using an embedding model (text-embedding-ada-002).
  3. On a query, cosine similarity is computed, returning top-5 chunks.
  4. The LLM generates an answer considering retrieved contexts and dialogue history.

Architecture of a Production Chatbot

[Client] → [Omnichannel Interface] → [NLP Engine: Intent + Entity] → [Dialog Manager] ├── RAG: answers from knowledge base ├── Action Engine: integrations with CRM/ERP └── Escalation: handoff to operator → [Response Generator] → [Analytics & Logging] 

Core: Classification and Slot Filling

Comparing the classic approach (Rasa) with LLM + function calling:

Parameter Intent + Slots (Rasa) LLM + Function Calling
Intent accuracy 90–95% 95–98%
Setup complexity Requires labeled examples Just describe tools
Flexibility Low for new scenarios High — LLM understands paraphrases

LLM with function calling reduces new scenario setup time by 3× compared to Rasa. Example tools configuration:

tools = [ { "name": "check_order_status", "description": "Проверить статус заказа по номеру", "parameters": {"order_id": {"type": "string"}} }, { "name": "initiate_return", "description": "Оформить возврат товара", "parameters": { "order_id": {"type": "string"}, "reason": {"type": "string"} } } ] 

Escalation to Operator

Triggers for handoff to a human: client explicitly asks for an operator, negative sentiment, bot fails to solve after 3 attempts, VIP client, legal claims. On escalation, the operator receives the full dialogue context — no need to ask the client to repeat.

Metrics and Quality

  • Containment rate: target 50–70%.
  • CSAT (bot): >4.0/5.0.
  • Resolution rate: % of issues actually resolved.
  • Escalation rate: balance — no higher than 30%, no lower than 10%.
Stage Time Result
MVP 4–6 weeks Basic intents + CRM integration
Full feature 3–4 months RAG, omnichannel, all scenarios

What's Included in the Work

  • Audit of business processes and preparation of knowledge base.
  • Design of dialogue scenario (up to 50 intents).
  • Development of integrations with CRM/ERP/billing.
  • Deployment on infrastructure (Kubernetes, AWS, or self-hosted).
  • Model training on historical dialogues (LoRA fine-tuning).
  • Monitoring and support for 3 months.

Timeline and Value

  • MVP: 4–6 weeks.
  • Full-featured bot with integrations: 3–4 months.
  • Operator cost savings — up to 70%, payback period — 6–12 months.

Omnichannel: Telegram, WhatsApp, Web Widget

The bot is deployed across multiple channels via a unified API. The architecture includes a channel-agnostic Dialog Manager: configure scenarios once, get the bot on Telegram, WhatsApp Business API, and website via web widget. Historical data is stored with a single CRM binding: if a client starts a conversation on Telegram and continues on the website, the operator sees the full chain.

For an omnichannel bot, we use RabbitMQ or Kafka queues: this ensures fault tolerance under peak loads and allows processing up to 500 simultaneous conversations on a single instance. Horizontal scaling is achieved by adding workers without changing the architecture.

We have been in the market, developed 40+ chatbots for e-commerce, fintech, logistics. We guarantee a containment rate of at least 50% after 3 months of operation. Assess your project: we'll send case studies and propose a turnkey architecture. Contact us for a consultation and get a detailed timeline estimate.