Unsupervised Document Grouping: Workflow, Methods, Practical Examples

When a corpus accumulates tens of thousands of unstructured documents, manual categorization becomes impossible. We develop a clustering pipeline that groups texts by semantic similarity without a single label. Our team delivers the project turnkey—from data audit to implementation and ongoing support, ensuring a reliable solution that scales with your business.

AI Development Areas

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • Development of a web application for FEEDME
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1344
  • Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1306
  • B2B Advance company logo design
    B2B Advance company logo design
    753
  • Development of a web application for Enviok
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1049
  • AIDER company logo development
    AIDER company logo development
    992
  • CRM development for Chasseurs
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1097
  • When a corpus holds tens of thousands of unorganized documents – support tickets, academic articles, legal files – manual sorting becomes infeasible. Grouping algorithms automatically arrange documents by semantic similarity with none of the labor.
  • The primary obstacle is high dimensionality: raw 768‑dimensional vectors from Sentence‑BERT produce weak groups unless reduced. We apply UMAP to shrink dimensions, followed by HDBSCAN for cluster identification. None of the alternative workflows we tested outpaced this combination.
  • We deployed this pipeline in three major engagements: segmenting 50k customer dialogues, organizing a 200k‑contract archive, and structuring a research paper database (approximately 30k entries). In each case, the silhouette score exceeded 0.4, indicating well‑separated groups. None of the projects required any manual labeling.
  • Typical pitfalls include ignoring stop words, setting an inappropriate min_cluster_size, and trusting a single evaluation metric. We recommend using at least two internal metrics and reviewing top words per cluster. None of these steps can be skipped if you want robust results.
  • This approach can cut manual annotation effort by up to 40%. To evaluate your corpus, contact us for a consultation. None of our engagements have ever failed to deliver actionable grouping.