AI Employee Turnover Prediction System Development

We design and deploy artificial intelligence systems: from prototype to production-ready solutions. Our team combines expertise in machine learning, data engineering and MLOps to make AI work not in the lab, but in real business.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1566 services
AI Employee Turnover Prediction System Development
Medium
~1-2 weeks
FAQ
AI Development Areas
AI Solution Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    823
  • image_logo-aider_0.jpg
    AIDER company logo development
    762
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    848

Development of an AI System for Employee Turnover Prediction

Predicting voluntary employee resignation is an HR task with direct financial impact. Replacing one employee costs 50-200% of their annual salary (recruiting, onboarding, productivity loss). An AI system identifies employees at high risk 1-3 months before resignation, when retention is still possible.

Ethical and Legal Constraints

Before starting—key constraints:

152-ФЗ / GDPR:

  • Explicit employee consent to process personal data for predictive analysis
  • Don't use data for automatic HR decisions (only as support)
  • Right to explanation and contestation of prediction

Ethical boundaries:

  • Don't use personal correspondence data
  • Don't apply covert biometric monitoring
  • Transparency: employees should know the system exists (not necessarily details)

Without these constraints, the system creates toxic culture and violates law.

Data for the Model

HR system (~ 80% of predictive power):

hr_features = {
    # Career track
    'months_since_last_promotion': months,
    'promotions_count_3y': count,
    'salary_vs_market': salary / market_benchmark,
    'performance_rating_last': rating_1_to_5,
    'performance_trend': rating_last - rating_prev,

    # Engagement
    'training_hours_annual': hours,
    'projects_participated': count,
    'internal_transfers_requested': count,

    # Working conditions
    'average_work_hours_weekly': hours,
    'remote_work_days_weekly': days,
    'manager_tenure': months_with_current_manager,
    'team_size': headcount,

    # Demographics (with caution and fairness audit)
    'tenure_months': total_months_at_company,
    'department': department_encoded
}

Engagement surveys: eNPS (Employee Net Promoter Score), pulse surveys: "Would you recommend this employer?", "Satisfied with manager?", "Do you see career prospects?"

Access control system:

  • Abnormally long work hours outside office
  • Changes in arrival/departure patterns

With permission and in aggregated form:

  • Frequency of HR system use for benefits review (may indicate market comparison)
  • Vacation requests: many days at once = possibly taking pause before leaving

Model and Target

Target definition: voluntary resignation within next 90 days.

Imbalance: typically 5-15% turnover per year = 1.5-4% per quarter. SMOTE or class_weight for balancing.

Algorithm: LightGBM with SHAP for explanations. Each employee in high-risk category gets top-3 risk factors—concrete reasons for HR manager.

Segment-level Analysis

Beyond individual scores, analysis by segments:

Cohort analysis: Which hire cohorts turn over faster? If cohort 2022-Q3 has 2× attrition—what happened at their hire/onboarding?

Department risk radar: Departments with systematically high resignation risk → systemic problem (poor management, uncompetitive pay, boring tasks).

Manager effectiveness: Employees under specific manager resign 3× more than average → HR flag.

Retention Actions

Action Matrix:

Risk Reason (SHAP) Action
High No promo in 18 months Career prospects discussion
High Salary < market Compensation review
High Manager conflict HR mediation
High Excessive overtime Workload review
Medium No training L&D program enrollment

Effectiveness measured through A/B: Randomize retention interventions across high-risk group, measure retention rate vs. control.

HR Dashboard

  • Workforce risk heat map by department
  • Top-10 individual risks with factors
  • Trend: how overall company resignation risk changes
  • Forecast: expected number of resignations in next 90 days (for recruiting planning)

HRIS integration: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, 1C:HRM—API for HR data retrieval and risk score recording.

Timeline: basic model on HR data from HRIS—4-5 weeks. Full system with SHAP explanations, dashboard and HRIS integration—3-4 months.