AI Predictive Maintenance System for IoT Devices

A fleet of 10,000 smart meters. One failure means a month of lost data. A technician visit costs are determined per project, but 70% of calls are false alarms. The classic approach—scheduled maintenance or reactive response—is inefficient: either you miss failures or waste resources. We built an ML

AI Development Areas

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1285
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1240
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    696
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    982
  • image_logo-aider_0.webp
    AIDER company logo development
    918
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1032

A fleet of 10,000 smart meters. One failure means a month of lost data. A technician visit costs are determined per project, but 70% of calls are false alarms. The classic approach—scheduled maintenance or reactive response—is inefficient: either you miss failures or waste resources. We built an ML system that predicts failures 30 days in advance with 88% recall and reduces unplanned downtime by 30%. Over 5 years, we have implemented over 50 projects in predictive maintenance for IoT—from industrial sensors to medical equipment. The system processes telemetry in real time, detects anomalies, and generates a risk score for each device. The dispatch algorithm optimally allocates resources, reducing technician visits by 40%.

How AI Solves the Class Imbalance Problem

Failures account for 0.1–2% of observations. Standard logistic regression gives recall < 30%. We use LightGBM with class_weight='balanced' and population training: first train a global model on the entire fleet, then fine-tune per device. This yields 88% recall even on rare failures. For LSTM RUL, which requires more data, we apply synthetic failure augmentation (SMOTE).

How We Build the Predictive Maintenance Pipeline

Device → MQTT Broker (EMQX) → Kafka → InfluxDB/TimescaleDB ↓ ML Pipeline (Kubeflow) ↓ Model Registry (MLflow) ↓ Triton Inference Server 

Stack: MQTT for telemetry collection, Kafka for buffering, InfluxDB for time-series storage. ML pipeline on Kubeflow, experiments logged in MLflow. Inference via Triton Inference Server with ONNX Runtime. For edge devices—quantized ONNX Runtime (4x model size reduction with <1% accuracy loss).

Criteria LightGBM (binary) LSTM RUL
Failure prediction accuracy 88% recall 82% recall
Inference time on CPU 0.3 ms 1.2 ms
Required data 100+ failures per type 500+ failures, sequences
Interpretability SHAP, feature importance Attention weights

LightGBM is easier to deploy (4 weeks). LSTM for critical systems where RUL accuracy matters.

Why LightGBM Wins on Speed and Interpretability

For tasks with 0.1% failures, LightGBM delivers stable 88% recall without complex tuning. Inference on CPU takes 0.3 ms—enabling predictions on every telemetry message in real time. Unlike LSTM, LightGBM is easily interpretable via SHAP: you see which features drive failure risk (temperature, vibration, reboot count).

How Federated Learning Protects Data

For medical devices with HIPAA/GDPR requirements, raw data cannot be transmitted. Federated learning trains local models on each device, sending only weight updates to a central server. This eliminates private data leakage.

Work Process: From Audit to Monitoring

Phase Duration Result
Discovery 1-2 weeks Fleet audit, data collection, metric definition (MAE RUL, ROC-AUC)
Data pipeline 2-3 weeks MQTT → Kafka → InfluxDB, cleaning, deduplication, schema unification
Model training 2-4 weeks Experiments in MLflow, model selection (LightGBM/LSTM), cross-validation
Deployment 1-2 weeks ONNX/Triton, Grafana dashboard with risk scores, OTA update mechanism
Monitoring 2 weeks Data drift, alerting, automatic retraining on distribution shift

What's Included in Deliverables

  • Architecture and pipeline documentation.
  • Trained model in ONNX or TorchScript format.
  • Grafana dashboard: risk scores, inference history, alerting.
  • Repository with code and configs for reproducibility.
  • OTA model update instructions for devices.
  • Two-day workshop for your team.
  • 6-month warranty on production model (support and refinement).

Timelines and Cost

Timelines range from 4 weeks (basic classifier) to 4 months (full LSTM + dispatch + OTA). Cost is calculated individually—depends on number of devices, types, and required accuracy. Get a consultation—we will send an estimate and timeline for your project. Maintenance savings can amount to significant reductions per year per thousand devices. Order a pilot project—we'll deploy an MVP on your fleet in 2 weeks.

Why Choose Us?

6-month warranty on production model. MLOps certifications (Kubeflow, MLflow). Experience with LSTM and LightGBM in production. Average reduction of unplanned downtime: 30%.