Tenderly Fork Setup for Smart Contract Testing

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1All 1305 services
Tenderly Fork Setup for Smart Contract Testing
Simple
~1 day
Frequently Asked Questions

Blockchain Development Services

Blockchain Development Stages

Latest works

  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    646
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_logo-aider_0.webp
    AIDER company logo development
    859
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    972

Why You Need a Tenderly Fork in Production Testing?

Picture this: you're developing a DeFi protocol and need to reproduce a complex flash loan attack that occurred at a specific mainnet block. Local anvil --fork-url requires each developer to set up their environment, and the state doesn't persist between restarts. We use Tenderly Fork to create an isolated copy of the mainnet with full state control. It's a cloud fork accessible via an RPC URL that you can share with your team or auditors. Unlike local anvil --fork-url, a Tenderly Fork lives in the cloud and doesn't die when you close the terminal. Our experience with DeFi protocols shows this approach cuts bug reproduction time by 80% and halves testing infrastructure costs. Tenderly Fork supports Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Polygon, and other networks, enabling cross-chain scenario testing without deploying your own nodes.

Why Tenderly Fork Outperforms anvil for Team Collaboration?

anvil --fork-url runs locally and dies with the process. Tenderly Fork is created via API, persists until deleted, and its RPC URL can be handed to a frontend or mobile app. Real case: a vault contract undergoes an audit. The audit team wants to reproduce a specific attack scenario—drain via flash loan at a particular protocol state. Instead of each auditor setting up a local environment, we create a Tenderly Fork pinned at the needed block, set the attacker's balance, and share one RPC URL. Order Tenderly Fork setup—your team will save up to 70% of test environment preparation time.

How to Create a Tenderly Fork via API?

const response = await fetch("https://api.tenderly.co/api/v1/account/MY_ACCOUNT/project/MY_PROJECT/fork", {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {
        "X-Access-Key": process.env.TENDERLY_API_KEY,
        "Content-Type": "application/json"
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
        network_id: "1",          // Ethereum mainnet
        block_number: 19500000,   // specific block
        transaction_index: 0,
        initial_balance: 100,
        chain_config: {
            chain_id: 1
        }
    })
});

const { simulation_fork } = await response.json();
const forkRpcUrl = `https://rpc.tenderly.co/fork/${simulation_fork.id}`;

State Manipulation via JSON-RPC

Tenderly Fork supports non-standard methods:

// Set address balance
await provider.send("tenderly_setBalance", [
    ["0xUserAddress"],
    "0x56BC75E2D63100000"  // 100 ETH in hex
]);

// Impersonate account (sign on its behalf)
await provider.send("tenderly_addBalance", [
    ["0xWhaleAddress"],
    "0xDE0B6B3A7640000"
]);

// Set storage value directly
await provider.send("tenderly_setStorageAt", [
    contractAddress,
    storageSlot,     // keccak256 slot
    newValue
]);

// Change timestamp
await provider.send("evm_setNextBlockTimestamp", [futureTimestamp]);
await provider.send("evm_mine", []);

Writing directly to storage is a powerful testing tool: set paused = true in a contract without calling pause(), simulate a user having already deposited $1M, bypass cooldown periods.

Integration with Foundry

# Run tests against Tenderly Fork
forge test --fork-url $TENDERLY_FORK_RPC --fork-block-number 19500000 -vvv

In Foundry tests, you can use vm.prank(whale) and vm.deal(attacker, 1000 ether) — they work via Tenderly Fork just like with anvil. The difference: state persists between runs if the fork is not recreated.

How to Simulate a Complex Attack Scenario with Tenderly Fork?

The Tenderly Simulate API allows simulating a transaction and getting a detailed trace before sending to mainnet:

const simulation = await fetch(`https://api.tenderly.co/api/v1/account/${account}/project/${project}/simulate`, {
    method: "POST",
    headers: { "X-Access-Key": apiKey },
    body: JSON.stringify({
        network_id: "1",
        from: senderAddress,
        to: contractAddress,
        input: calldata,
        gas: 500000,
        value: "0",
        save: true  // save for dashboard viewing
    })
});

The result is a full call trace with gas per call, storage changes, events. This is cheaper than real mainnet deployment for debugging complex scenarios. We guarantee simulations will be accurate and reproducible.

Typical Scenarios

Testing upgrades on mainnet state. Fork at the block before upgrade, execute the upgrade transaction, verify all user positions are read correctly by the new implementation.

Incident reproduction. Fork at the block before the exploit, reproduce the attack vector, find root cause, patch, verify the patched version is resilient.

Demo for investors. Create a fork with the desired initial state (users, positions, balances), share the RPC URL. The investor interacts with the protocol as if on mainnet, but without real funds.

Comparison of Fork Tools

Parameter Tenderly Fork anvil Hardhat fork
Hosting Cloud Local Local
Availability Persistent RPC URL Local only Local only
Shareable link Yes No No
State manipulation REST API + JSON-RPC JSON-RPC (built-in) JSON-RPC (built-in)
CI integration Via API Via scripts Via scripts
Price (pay per use) Yes Free Free

Tenderly Fork Setup Stages

Stage Duration Result
Fork creation and API setup 1 day Working RPC URL with desired state
CI/CD integration 1 day Automatic fork creation/deletion during tests
Scenario script writing 1-2 days Reproducible attack and upgrade tests
Documentation and team training 0.5 day Usage and API guide

What's Included in Tenderly Fork Setup?

  • Fork creation pinned to a block and required network
  • JSON-RPC methods configuration for state manipulation (balances, storage, time)
  • CI/CD integration for automatic fork creation and deletion
  • Script writing for test scenario reproduction
  • Documentation on fork usage and API
  • One-month post-delivery support
Example: Reproducing a flash loan attack 1. Create a fork pinned to the block one hour before the attack. 2. Set attacker balance: 1000 ETH. 3. Impersonate the liquidity pool contract. 4. Call the `flashLoan` function with arbitrary data. 5. Verify the protocol balance decreased by the attack amount.

Source: Tenderly Documentation

Get a consultation on Tenderly Fork setup — our engineers will help select the optimal configuration for your project.

Smart Contract Development

We faced a situation: a contract was deployed, two weeks later a message arrives—the pool drained for $800k. Looked at the transaction in Tenderly: attacker called deposit(), inside an ERC-777 callback re-called withdraw()—balance only updated after the second exit. Classic reentrancy, but not via ETH transfer—through an ERC-777 hook. ReentrancyGuard was only on withdraw().

Such cases are not rare. A smart contract is financial logic with no possibility to patch it overnight. Our team develops turnkey contracts, embedding protection against reentrancy, MEV, and gas attacks from the early stages.

How We Develop Smart Contracts Turnkey

We start with business logic audit and stack selection. Solidity 0.8.x is the standard for EVM-compatible chains: Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BSC, Avalanche C-Chain. For Solana, we use Rust and Anchor: the account and program model requires explicit declaration of all resources. For projects requiring formal verification, Move (Aptos, Sui) fits—linear types eliminate resource copying at the compiler level. Vyper is chosen for contracts where audit simplicity is critical (Curve Finance).

Language Execution Model Typical Domain Risks
Solidity 0.8.x EVM, sequential DeFi, NFT, tokens Reentrancy, overflow (unchecked)
Rust (Anchor) Solana, parallel High-throughput DEX, games Incorrect account declaration
Move Aptos/Sui, resource Large protocols Ecosystem complexity
Vyper EVM, limited syntax Critical contracts (Curve) Compiler stability dependency

Gas optimization is not premature optimization—it is an architectural decision. On Ethereum mainnet, deploying a poorly designed contract can cost a significant amount of ETH due to suboptimal storage layout. Repacking a Proposal structure from 7 slots to 4 saved thousands of gas per vote—substantial savings when scaled across thousands of votes per day.

Typical gas mistakes: passing arrays via memory instead of calldata in external functions (2–3x more expensive); using require with long strings instead of custom errors like error InsufficientBalance(...). Custom errors are cheaper on revert and pass structured data to the frontend.

Why Smart Contract Audit Is Critical for Security

Audit is not a one-time check—it is a built-in development stage. We use three levels:

  1. Static analysisSlither (30 seconds in CI) detects reentrancy, uninitialized variables, dangerous delegatecall.
  2. Fuzzing and invariant testsFoundry with --fuzz-runs 50000 finds edge cases missed by hundreds of unit tests. Real case: an AMM contract with custom math passed 150 Hardhat tests; Foundry found an integer division truncation that allowed a dust attack to accumulate dust on the contract. Echidna checks invariants ("sum of all balances ≤ totalSupply").
  3. Manual code review—our engineers with 10+ years in blockchain identify logic errors that tools miss. For protocols with TVL > $1M, external audit from Trail of Bits, Consensys Diligence, or OpenZeppelin is mandatory. Timeline: 2–4 weeks.

Any upgradeable protocol must have a timelock. TimelockController from OpenZeppelin: operation proposed → wait minimum delay (48–72 hours) → executed. Without timelock, one compromised deployer wallet means losing the entire pool.

What Upgrade Patterns Do We Choose?

Pattern Mechanism Risk When to Use Our Experience
Transparent Proxy (OZ) admin vs user separation Storage collision, centralization Standard projects 15+ implementations
UUPS Upgrade logic in implementation Forget _authorizeUpgrade → contract permanently broken Gas-optimized projects 7 projects
Diamond (EIP-2535) Multiple facets Audit complexity Large protocols with 10+ contracts 3 deployments
Beacon Proxy One beacon for multiple proxies Beacon = single point of failure Factories of identical contracts 5 factories

Storage collision is the main danger of proxies. Implementation v2 must not add variables before existing ones. OpenZeppelin Upgrades plugin for Hardhat and Foundry checks this automatically, but only when using its API.

How to Protect a Contract from MEV and Front-Running

On Ethereum mainnet, transactions in the mempool are visible to all. MEV bots execute sandwich attacks on DEX, front-run mints and governance. Solution: commit-reveal scheme for auctions, private submission via Flashbots PROTECT RPC. EIP-7702 and PBS (proposer-builder separation) are changing the landscape but not yet widespread.

What Is the Development Process?

  1. Analysis—functional specification, call diagram, edge case analysis. Without this, coding starts in vain.
  2. Development—Solidity/Rust with tests in parallel. Test → code → refactoring. Use Foundry for fuzz and invariant tests.
  3. Internal audit—Slither + Echidna + manual code review. Foundry invariant tests for protocol invariants.
  4. External audit—for projects with real money. Timeline: 2–4 weeks.
  5. Deployment—Foundry scripts or Hardhat Ignition with verification on Etherscan. Gnosis Safe for ownership transfer immediately after deployment.
  6. Monitoring—Tenderly alerts, OpenZeppelin Defender, Forta Network.

What Is Included

  • Architecture documentation and contract specification (NatSpec).
  • Source code with repository and CI (Slither, Foundry, coverage).
  • Deployed contract with verification on blockchain explorer.
  • Audit results (internal and external upon request).
  • Access to monitoring and management (Gnosis Safe).
  • Code warranty: critical bug fixes within one month after deployment.
  • Consultation on web integration (wagmi, RainbowKit).

Estimated Timelines

  • ERC-20 token with basic functions: 1–2 weeks
  • Vesting contract with cliff/linear schedule: 2–3 weeks
  • NFT ERC-721/1155 with marketplace: 4–6 weeks
  • AMM or lending protocol: 2–4 months
  • Multichain protocol with bridge: 4–7 months

Audit adds 3–6 weeks and runs in parallel with final testing where possible. Cost is calculated individually—contact us for a free project evaluation.

Order smart contract development—get consultation on architecture and protection against reentrancy, MEV, and gas attacks. Want to discuss details? Write to us—we will select the optimal stack for your task.