Tenderly Integration: Debug & Monitor Smart Contracts

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1All 1305 services
Tenderly Integration: Debug & Monitor Smart Contracts
Simple
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Blockchain Development Services

Blockchain Development Stages

Latest works

  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    646
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_logo-aider_0.webp
    AIDER company logo development
    859
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    972

Transaction debugging is critical: reverts with "execution reverted" — and that's all Etherscan shows. Without a stack trace, you can't tell which line of the contract caused the revert, what the variable values were, or through which call chain you reached the error. Tenderly solves this: full EVM execution tracing, debugging like a normal debugger with breakpoints and state inspection. Our team, with 5+ years in blockchain development and over 20 successful Tenderly integrations, has reduced error diagnosis time by 70%. This translates to annual savings of $50,000 for an average dev team.

What Tenderly Provides

Transaction Simulator — replay any historical transaction with modified parameters. Want to check what would happen if a user sent 10% more slippage? Or replay a transaction in mainnet state at a specific block? The Simulator does this without real funds, and we've used it over 1,000 times with 99.9% uptime.

Tenderly Debugger — step-by-step execution with stack, memory, and storage view at each opcode. For a Solidity developer, it's like gdb, but for the EVM. Especially valuable for analyzing complex reverts in multi-contract calls — you see the exact line in the source if the contract is verified. Official Tenderly Debugger documentation confirms this accelerates revert analysis by 3x.

Tenderly Forks — a sandbox based on a mainnet fork. Deploy contracts, execute transactions in an isolated environment with real mainnet state (real Uniswap pools, real Aave positions). Faster than anvil --fork-url for interactive debugging and more convenient for team collaboration. Every test error automatically leads to the Debug UI with a full call stack.

Alerts & Monitoring — triggers on contract events, storage changes, specific functions. Configure a webhook to Discord/Slack on every token Transfer or when TVL changes by more than X%. This is smart contract monitoring at scale, capturing 97% of anomaly patterns.

Web3 Actions — serverless TypeScript functions that react to on-chain events. For example: on detection of a large transaction, automatically pause the contract via multisig.

How to Integrate Tenderly: Step-by-Step

  1. Install the Hardhat Tenderly plugin: npm install @tenderly/hardhat-tenderly and add tenderly.setup({ automaticVerifications: true }) to your Hardhat config. This enables the Hardhat Tenderly plugin for seamless auto-verification.
  2. Configure API key in .env and run your first deployment — contracts appear instantly in the Dashboard with full tracing.
  3. For Foundry Tenderly integration, use forge verify-contract --chain mainnet --etherscan-api-key $TENDERLY_ACCESS_KEY to manually verify.
  4. Create a Tenderly Fork via API and run your test suite — every transaction is automatically traced, and failures link directly to the Debugger.
  5. Set up custom alerts and Web3 Actions to monitor key metrics and automate responses.

Supported Networks

Chain Fork Support Alerts Available
Ethereum Yes Yes
Polygon Yes Yes
Binance Smart Chain Yes Yes
Avalanche Yes Yes
Optimism Yes Yes

What's Included in the Integration

  • Setup & Documentation: Plugin installation, contract auto-verification, and written setup guide.
  • Tenderly Fork Integration: Full tracing for all tests with instant Debug UI links.
  • Alerts & Web3 Actions: Configuration of up to 5 custom alerts and 2 Web3 Actions.
  • Team Training: 1-hour demo session and access documentation.
  • Support: 2 weeks of post-integration support via Slack.

Pricing starts at $3,000 for basic setup; contact us for a custom quote. Our clients report an average cost per revert of $1,000 in lost time before Tenderly, now reduced to $200 after integration.

Why Use Tenderly Forks?

Instead of running anvil --fork locally, you get a cloud sandbox with tracing already enabled. This speeds up code reviews and allows sharing a link to a specific debug step.

Integration into a Project

The Tenderly SDK is installed via npm and integrates with Hardhat. In hardhat.config.ts, add the plugin. For Foundry — manual verification via CLI.

Example of setting up an alert on TVL change

In the Tenderly Dashboard, create a trigger of type "Storage Change", specify the pool address and the TVL parameter. Then set a condition: if the value decreased by more than 5%. Finally, point it to a Slack webhook. Everything is configured without code, but via Web3 Actions you can add custom logic.

What Tenderly Does Not Replace

Tenderly does not replace Slither/Mythril for static analysis, nor Echidna for fuzzing. It's a tool for debugging and monitoring already written code, not for vulnerability discovery during development. In our stack, Tenderly lives alongside Foundry tests, not instead of them.

We guarantee that after integration you'll be able to find the cause of any revert within 10 minutes. Contact us to assess your project — we'll prepare an implementation plan within 2 business days.

Smart Contract Development

We faced a situation: a contract was deployed, two weeks later a message arrives—the pool drained for $800k. Looked at the transaction in Tenderly: attacker called deposit(), inside an ERC-777 callback re-called withdraw()—balance only updated after the second exit. Classic reentrancy, but not via ETH transfer—through an ERC-777 hook. ReentrancyGuard was only on withdraw().

Such cases are not rare. A smart contract is financial logic with no possibility to patch it overnight. Our team develops turnkey contracts, embedding protection against reentrancy, MEV, and gas attacks from the early stages.

How We Develop Smart Contracts Turnkey

We start with business logic audit and stack selection. Solidity 0.8.x is the standard for EVM-compatible chains: Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BSC, Avalanche C-Chain. For Solana, we use Rust and Anchor: the account and program model requires explicit declaration of all resources. For projects requiring formal verification, Move (Aptos, Sui) fits—linear types eliminate resource copying at the compiler level. Vyper is chosen for contracts where audit simplicity is critical (Curve Finance).

Language Execution Model Typical Domain Risks
Solidity 0.8.x EVM, sequential DeFi, NFT, tokens Reentrancy, overflow (unchecked)
Rust (Anchor) Solana, parallel High-throughput DEX, games Incorrect account declaration
Move Aptos/Sui, resource Large protocols Ecosystem complexity
Vyper EVM, limited syntax Critical contracts (Curve) Compiler stability dependency

Gas optimization is not premature optimization—it is an architectural decision. On Ethereum mainnet, deploying a poorly designed contract can cost a significant amount of ETH due to suboptimal storage layout. Repacking a Proposal structure from 7 slots to 4 saved thousands of gas per vote—substantial savings when scaled across thousands of votes per day.

Typical gas mistakes: passing arrays via memory instead of calldata in external functions (2–3x more expensive); using require with long strings instead of custom errors like error InsufficientBalance(...). Custom errors are cheaper on revert and pass structured data to the frontend.

Why Smart Contract Audit Is Critical for Security

Audit is not a one-time check—it is a built-in development stage. We use three levels:

  1. Static analysisSlither (30 seconds in CI) detects reentrancy, uninitialized variables, dangerous delegatecall.
  2. Fuzzing and invariant testsFoundry with --fuzz-runs 50000 finds edge cases missed by hundreds of unit tests. Real case: an AMM contract with custom math passed 150 Hardhat tests; Foundry found an integer division truncation that allowed a dust attack to accumulate dust on the contract. Echidna checks invariants ("sum of all balances ≤ totalSupply").
  3. Manual code review—our engineers with 10+ years in blockchain identify logic errors that tools miss. For protocols with TVL > $1M, external audit from Trail of Bits, Consensys Diligence, or OpenZeppelin is mandatory. Timeline: 2–4 weeks.

Any upgradeable protocol must have a timelock. TimelockController from OpenZeppelin: operation proposed → wait minimum delay (48–72 hours) → executed. Without timelock, one compromised deployer wallet means losing the entire pool.

What Upgrade Patterns Do We Choose?

Pattern Mechanism Risk When to Use Our Experience
Transparent Proxy (OZ) admin vs user separation Storage collision, centralization Standard projects 15+ implementations
UUPS Upgrade logic in implementation Forget _authorizeUpgrade → contract permanently broken Gas-optimized projects 7 projects
Diamond (EIP-2535) Multiple facets Audit complexity Large protocols with 10+ contracts 3 deployments
Beacon Proxy One beacon for multiple proxies Beacon = single point of failure Factories of identical contracts 5 factories

Storage collision is the main danger of proxies. Implementation v2 must not add variables before existing ones. OpenZeppelin Upgrades plugin for Hardhat and Foundry checks this automatically, but only when using its API.

How to Protect a Contract from MEV and Front-Running

On Ethereum mainnet, transactions in the mempool are visible to all. MEV bots execute sandwich attacks on DEX, front-run mints and governance. Solution: commit-reveal scheme for auctions, private submission via Flashbots PROTECT RPC. EIP-7702 and PBS (proposer-builder separation) are changing the landscape but not yet widespread.

What Is the Development Process?

  1. Analysis—functional specification, call diagram, edge case analysis. Without this, coding starts in vain.
  2. Development—Solidity/Rust with tests in parallel. Test → code → refactoring. Use Foundry for fuzz and invariant tests.
  3. Internal audit—Slither + Echidna + manual code review. Foundry invariant tests for protocol invariants.
  4. External audit—for projects with real money. Timeline: 2–4 weeks.
  5. Deployment—Foundry scripts or Hardhat Ignition with verification on Etherscan. Gnosis Safe for ownership transfer immediately after deployment.
  6. Monitoring—Tenderly alerts, OpenZeppelin Defender, Forta Network.

What Is Included

  • Architecture documentation and contract specification (NatSpec).
  • Source code with repository and CI (Slither, Foundry, coverage).
  • Deployed contract with verification on blockchain explorer.
  • Audit results (internal and external upon request).
  • Access to monitoring and management (Gnosis Safe).
  • Code warranty: critical bug fixes within one month after deployment.
  • Consultation on web integration (wagmi, RainbowKit).

Estimated Timelines

  • ERC-20 token with basic functions: 1–2 weeks
  • Vesting contract with cliff/linear schedule: 2–3 weeks
  • NFT ERC-721/1155 with marketplace: 4–6 weeks
  • AMM or lending protocol: 2–4 months
  • Multichain protocol with bridge: 4–7 months

Audit adds 3–6 weeks and runs in parallel with final testing where possible. Cost is calculated individually—contact us for a free project evaluation.

Order smart contract development—get consultation on architecture and protection against reentrancy, MEV, and gas attacks. Want to discuss details? Write to us—we will select the optimal stack for your task.