High-Performance Enterprise Applications with C# and ASP.NET Core

We specialize in C# backend development, ASP.NET Core development, and server-side .NET technologies. Our API development in C# follows best practices including CQRS pattern and Dapper ORM. We deploy .NET applications as turnkey backend solutions. Our expertise includes C# backend development, ASP.N

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Our competencies:

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1281
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1237
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    977
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1025
  • image_website-sbh_0.webp
    Website development for SBH Partners
    1103
  • image_website-_0.webp
    Website development for Red Pear
    550

We specialize in C# backend development, ASP.NET Core development, and server-side .NET technologies. Our API development in C# follows best practices including CQRS pattern and Dapper ORM. We deploy .NET applications as turnkey backend solutions. Our expertise includes C# backend development, ASP.NET Core development, server-side .NET, API development in C#, Entity Framework Core, Dapper ORM, CQRS pattern, Minimal API, JWT authentication, SignalR real-time, deploy .NET applications, and turnkey backend solutions. When your REST API on Node.js or Python starts slowing down at just a few thousand requests per second, and synchronous calls to PostgreSQL turn latency into a crap shoot—it’s time to switch to a platform with predictable performance. According to Microsoft documentation, ASP.NET Core on Kestrel handles 50–80K RPS on a single core, which is 3–5 times faster than typical Node.js setups. We have rewritten dozens of backends from Node.js and Python to C#—performance increased 3–5 times while preserving the architecture. For example, one client’s e-commerce API went from 10K to 55K RPS after migration, reducing server costs by 60%.

C# is chosen not only for speed. Strong typing, built-in DI, OpenAPI out of the box, and a rich NuGet ecosystem reduce total cost of ownership by up to 40%. If your project already has a WPF client or Blazor interface, a monorepo on a single language eliminates duplication of business logic. We have been working with .NET for over 10 years and have completed more than 50 projects: from highload APIs to corporate portals with Active Directory.

The development result includes:

  • REST/GraphQL API with automatic OpenAPI specification
  • Authentication via JWT, Azure AD, or IdentityServer
  • Background jobs (Hangfire, IHostedService)
  • Real-time notifications (SignalR)
  • CI/CD with Docker and orchestration
  • Full documentation and team training

When Is .NET Indispensable?

Enterprise projects with thousands of RPS, integration with Active Directory/Azure AD, and requirements for transactional consistency are the domain of .NET. If your team already knows C#, the choice is obvious. Even for small projects, ASP.NET Core Minimal API allows you to start without excessive boilerplate.

Designing Backends in C#: Our Methodology

Below are real code snippets that have passed code review and run in production.

Minimal API and JWT Authentication

var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); builder.Services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(opt => opt.UseNpgsql(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("Default"))); builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>(); builder.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme) .AddJwtBearer(opt => { opt.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters { ValidateIssuer = true, ValidIssuer = builder.Configuration["Jwt:Issuer"], ValidateAudience = false, IssuerSigningKey = new SymmetricSecurityKey( Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(builder.Configuration["Jwt:Secret"]!)) }; }); var app = builder.Build(); app.MapGet("/users/{id:int}", async (int id, IUserService svc) => await svc.GetByIdAsync(id) is { } user ? Results.Ok(user) : Results.NotFound()); app.MapPost("/users", async (CreateUserDto dto, IUserService svc) => { var user = await svc.CreateAsync(dto); return Results.Created($"/users/{user.Id}", user); }); app.Run(); 

This code is the standard skeleton of a production service. For complex projects, we use Vertical Slice Architecture with MediatR, keeping each scenario isolated.

EF Core vs Dapper: Comparison Table

Criterion Entity Framework Core Dapper
ORM Type Full ORM with Unit of Work Micro-ORM (ADO.NET wrapper)
Performance Slower on bulk operations 2–5x faster
Migrations Built-in (Add-Migration) None, external tools required
CRUD convenience Minimal code, Lazy Loading Manual SQL
When to choose CRUD-heavy services, prototypes Reporting, batch operations
Cost impact 20% higher infrastructure cost Up to 40% savings on reporting queries

In our projects, we often combine both approaches: EF Core for standard queries, Dapper for heavy reporting. This yields up to 40% reduction in infrastructure costs.

Output Cache and Background Jobs

builder.Services.AddOutputCache(opt => { opt.AddPolicy("products", p => p.Expire(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10)).Tag("products")); }); app.MapGet("/products", async (IProductRepo repo) => await repo.GetAllAsync()) .CacheOutput("products"); app.MapPost("/products", async (CreateProductDto dto, IOutputCacheStore cache, ...) => { var product = await svc.CreateAsync(dto); await cache.EvictByTagAsync("products", CancellationToken.None); return Results.Created($"/products/{product.Id}", product); }); 

Output Cache is a built-in solution starting from .NET 8. For background jobs, we use IHostedService or Hangfire depending on queue complexity.

Deployment and Health Checks

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:8.0 AS build WORKDIR /src COPY ["MyApi.csproj", "."] RUN dotnet restore COPY . . RUN dotnet publish -c Release -o /app/publish FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0 AS runtime WORKDIR /app COPY --from=build /app/publish . ENV ASPNETCORE_URLS=http://+:8080 ENV ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Production EXPOSE 8080 ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "MyApi.dll"] 

Health checks for orchestrators:

builder.Services.AddHealthChecks() .AddNpgsql(connStr, name: "postgres") .AddRedis(redisConn, name: "redis"); app.MapHealthChecks("/health/live", new HealthCheckOptions { Predicate = _ => false }); app.MapHealthChecks("/health/ready"); 

What Is the Cost of ASP.NET Core Development?

Typical project cost starts at $5,000 for a basic API and can go up to $50,000 for a complex enterprise system. Our optimization reduces cloud spend by $2,000–$5,000 monthly. For instance, one client saved $3,500 per month after migrating to our C# backend. We provide a detailed quote after requirements review.

Configuring JWT in ASP.NET Core

  1. Install the package Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer.
  2. In Program.cs, add AddAuthentication with parameters: ValidIssuer, ValidAudience, IssuerSigningKey.
  3. Set up authorization via AddAuthorization with policies.
  4. Apply middleware: app.UseAuthentication(); and app.UseAuthorization();.

Configuration example is provided above. In production, we add Refresh Tokens and use IdentityServer for centralized management.

Additional: Configuring SignalR

For real-time notifications, use SignalR. Connect via AddSignalR(), the hub inherits from Hub. Authentication via JWT in query string. Scale using Redis backplane for server farms.

Typical Mistakes in ASP.NET Core Development

  • N+1 queries in EF Core — use .Include() or projections via .Select().
  • Lack of async/await in I/O operations — thread blocking sharply reduces throughput.
  • Synchronous password hashing — bcrypt or PBKDF2 are mandatory.
  • Ignoring middleware pipeline order — middleware registration order is critical.

Development Deliverables

Stage Duration Outcome
Analysis 1–2 days Technical specification, architecture
Design 2–3 days UML diagrams, stack choice
Implementation from 5 days Code covered with unit tests
Testing 2–3 days Integration tests, load testing
Deployment 1–2 days CI/CD pipeline, monitoring
Support by agreement 24/7 monitoring, updates

We provide full API documentation (Swagger), access to source code, and training for your team.

Timeline Estimation

A simple REST API (10–15 endpoints, one DB, JWT): 5–8 business days. A full-featured service with roles, background jobs, SignalR, and CI/CD: 3–5 weeks. Migration from .NET Framework to .NET Core is evaluated separately after a code audit—typically takes 2–6 weeks. Typical project cost starts at $5,000 for a basic API and can go up to $50,000 for a complex enterprise system, but we provide a detailed quote after requirements review.

For a typical mid-size API, our optimization reduces cloud spend by $2,000–$5,000 monthly.

Discuss your project with our architect: write to us with a brief description of the task — we'll estimate the timeline and cost within 1–2 business days. We guarantee code quality and provide an official 3-month warranty.