UserVoice Integration: Collect Feature Requests & Feedback

The Problem

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Our competencies:

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1283
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1238
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    980
  • image_crm_chasseurs_493_0.webp
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1029
  • image_website-sbh_0.webp
    Website development for SBH Partners
    1104
  • image_website-_0.webp
    Website development for Red Pear
    552

The Problem

Feature requests from users are scattered across support tickets, chats, and direct messages. It's impossible to determine what truly matters — voices are lost, and the team spends hours extracting priorities. UserVoice turns this chaos into a transparent system: users submit ideas, vote, and you see an objective ranking. For example, for a SaaS platform with 10,000 users, we configured UserVoice with SSO and Jira integration: feature request analysis time dropped from 2 days to 2 hours — productivity increased 5–10x. The number of processed proposals grew from 30 to 150 per month without team expansion.

We integrate UserVoice on your website — from a widget to full integration with SSO, Jira, and custom fields. Turnkey: we design, implement, test, and deliver documentation. Get a consultation — we'll evaluate your project for free in one day.

Problems We Solve

Lost Feedback

Without a single entry point, ideas drown in email and messengers. UserVoice collects everything in one forum with status filters (Open / In Progress / Completed). Time savings on processing incoming requests: up to 40%.

Inability to Prioritize

Voting and custom fields (e.g., client tier) allow sorting proposals by importance. Built-in analytics show which features will yield the highest ROI. UserVoice is three times more effective than manual analysis for teams of five or more.

Manual Backlog Sync

If an idea moves to development, its status in UserVoice doesn't update automatically. We set up Jira integration — when an idea's status changes, a task is created in Jira with the required fields, and vice versa. This eliminates duplicate work and reduces the risk of errors.

How UserVoice Prioritizes

UserVoice uses a voting system and custom fields to automatically rank feature requests. You can assign weight to each vote based on client type (e.g., enterprise users get higher priority). Combining this with CSAT scores, the system builds an objective ranking that updates in real time. This eliminates manual counting and subjective decisions.

Why Trust Us with the Integration?

Our team has over 10 years in web development and more than 40 projects involving feedback integration. We guarantee 14 days of free support after delivery and transfer all rights to the code and documentation. Request a free project evaluation — receive an integration plan within a day.

What's Included in Our Work

Stage What We Do Result
Analysis Study your current feedback flow, choose use case Technical specification
Design Determine widget placement, fields, sync routes Integration architecture
Implementation Embed the widget, configure SSO (OAuth or JWT), write Jira sync code Working prototype on staging
Testing Check all scenarios: submit idea, vote, status update, sync Passed checklist
Deployment Roll out to production, hand over admin panel, instructions, and access Ready solution + documentation

Timeline: from 2 to 5 business days depending on complexity (SSO, custom fields, number of systems to sync). Cost is calculated individually after a brief.

UserVoice vs. Alternatives

Criterion UserVoice Google Forms / Trello
Idea voting + (built-in ranking) - (manual count)
Status automation + (webhook, Jira) - (manual update)
CSAT surveys + -
Analytics API Full REST Limited

For projects with more than 50 proposals per month, UserVoice pays off through prioritization and automation — investments are recouped within 3–4 months.

When UserVoice Is Not Suitable

If you have a small project (up to 500 users) and a limited budget, starting with Google Forms or Trello might be simpler. UserVoice is justified when proposal volume exceeds 50 per month and you need a prioritization system.

What UserVoice + Jira Integration Gives You

Automatic status synchronization eliminates manual task updates. When an idea's status changes in UserVoice (e.g., "In Progress"), a task is created in Jira with specified fields: priority, component, sprint. Reverse sync is also configured: transitioning a task to "Done" automatically closes the idea in UserVoice. This reduces backlog management time by 30% and prevents data desynchronization. Contact us to discuss integration details tailored to your process.