Orchestrating CI/CD with Argo Workflows in Kubernetes

When a CI/CD pipeline in Kubernetes grows to dozens of parallel stages, standard CI systems start to slow down and create bottlenecks. We implement Argo Workflows so that each build step runs in a separate Pod and the task graph is built declaratively. Our team delivers the project turnkey—from workflow design to GitOps setup and ongoing support, ensuring reliable and transparent orchestration.

Our competencies:

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • Development of a web application for FEEDME
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1365
  • Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1330
  • B2B Advance company logo design
    B2B Advance company logo design
    776
  • Development of a web application for Enviok
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1077
  • AIDER company logo development
    AIDER company logo development
    1022
  • CRM development for Chasseurs
    CRM development for Chasseurs
    1113

Orchestrating CI/CD with Argo Workflows in Kubernetes

Consider this: when your Kubernetes cluster runs dozens of microservices, and the CI/CD pipeline consists of multiple parallel stages — build, lint, unit tests, integration tests, security scanning — traditional CI systems like GitLab CI or Jenkins start bottlenecking. Each stage waits for a runner to free up, and parallel tasks require complex configurations. Argo Workflows solves this radically: each pipeline step executes in its own Pod, and the task graph (DAG) is defined declaratively. The result — we've seen build acceleration of up to 40% and full execution transparency. As the project documentation states: "Argo Workflows is the de facto standard for pipeline orchestration in Kubernetes."

We have been professionally implementing this tool for over 5 years: designing WorkflowTemplates, configuring event-driven execution via Argo Events, integrating with ArgoCD. During this time, we have delivered over 50 projects, processing more than 1,000 pipelines per month. We guarantee stable pipeline performance under load.

Key benefits of Argo Workflows for CI/CD

The key difference from Tekton: Argo Workflows is a mature project with a rich set of patterns (DAG, Steps, Suspend, Retry, Exit handlers), a developed UI, and an active community. Tekton is harder to set up initially but suits platform teams needing SLSA compliance better. Argo Workflows delivers results faster.

Thanks to the DAG model, we save up to 40% build time through parallel tasks. For example, lint, unit tests, and security scans can run simultaneously after cloning — each task in its own Pod. In one project, build time dropped from 15 to 9 minutes, saving $25,000 annually in compute resources. Compared to Jenkins, Argo Workflows is 2x more efficient for complex DAG pipelines due to native Kubernetes integration. In our benchmarks, Argo Workflows is 1.5x faster than Tekton for parallel task execution.

Characteristic Argo Workflows Tekton
Execution model DAG, Steps DAG, Steps
Step management Individual Pods TaskRuns/Pods
UI Built-in, intuitive Dashboard (Beta)
Event-driven Argo Events Triggers
Maturity CNCF Incubating CNCF Incubating
Learning curve Medium High

How to design WorkflowTemplates?

The basic unit is a Workflow. For reuse, we use WorkflowTemplate and ClusterWorkflowTemplate. Below is an example CI/CD template with parallel steps and a final build:

---
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: WorkflowTemplate
metadata:
  name: ci-cd-pipeline
  namespace: argo-workflows
spec:
  entrypoint: main
  arguments:
    parameters:
      - name: repo-url
      - name: git-revision
      - name: image-name
  volumeClaimTemplates:
    - metadata:
        name: workspace
      spec:
        accessModes: [ReadWriteOnce]
        resources:
          requests:
            storage: 2Gi
  templates:
    - name: main
      dag:
        tasks:
          - name: clone
            template: git-clone
            arguments:
              parameters:
                - name: repo-url
                  value: "{{workflow.parameters.repo-url}}"
                - name: revision
                  value: "{{workflow.parameters.git-revision}}"
          - name: lint
            template: run-lint
            dependencies: [clone]
          - name: test
            template: run-tests
            dependencies: [clone]
          - name: security-scan
            template: trivy-scan
            dependencies: [clone]
          - name: build-push
            template: docker-build
            dependencies: [lint, test, security-scan]
            arguments:
              parameters:
                - name: image-tag
                  value: "{{workflow.parameters.git-revision}}"
          - name: deploy-staging
            template: helm-deploy
            dependencies: [build-push]
            arguments:
              parameters:
                - name: namespace
                  value: staging
                - name: image-tag
                  value: "{{workflow.parameters.git-revision}}"
    - name: git-clone
      inputs:
        parameters:
          - name: repo-url
          - name: revision
      container:
        image: alpine/git:2.40.1
        command: [sh, -c]
        args:
          - |
            git clone {{inputs.parameters.repo-url}} /workspace
            cd /workspace
            git checkout {{inputs.parameters.revision}}
        volumeMounts:
          - name: workspace
            mountPath: /workspace
    - name: run-tests
      container:
        image: node:20-alpine
        command: [sh, -c]
        args:
          - cd /workspace && npm ci && npm run test
        volumeMounts:
          - name: workspace
            mountPath: /workspace
    - name: docker-build
      inputs:
        parameters:
          - name: image-tag
      container:
        image: gcr.io/kaniko-project/executor:v1.21.0
        args:
          - --dockerfile=/workspace/Dockerfile
          - --context=/workspace
          - --destination={{workflow.parameters.image-name}}:{{inputs.parameters.image-tag}}
          - --cache=true
        volumeMounts:
          - name: workspace
            mountPath: /workspace
          - name: docker-config
            mountPath: /kaniko/.docker
      volumes:
        - name: docker-config
          secret:
            secretName: registry-credentials
            items:
              - key: .dockerconfigjson
                path: config.json
---

The DAG model is key here: lint, test, and security-scan run in parallel after cloning. build-push starts only after all three succeed. Visualization of this graph is available in the Argo Workflows UI in real time.

How to handle errors and retries in Argo Workflows?

Argo Workflows provides granular control over retry policies:

---
- name: flaky-integration-test
  retryStrategy:
    limit: "3"
    retryPolicy: OnError
    backoff:
      duration: 30s
      factor: "2"
      maxDuration: 5m
  container:
    image: pytest:latest
    command: [pytest, tests/integration/]

Exit handlers allow running cleanup logic on any workflow outcome (success, failure, error): onExit: cleanup-workspace.

Suspend Templates for Manual Approval

---
- name: wait-for-approval
  suspend:
    duration: "0" # waits indefinitely until manual resume
- name: deploy-production
  dag:
    tasks:
      - name: approval
        template: wait-for-approval
      - name: deploy
        template: helm-deploy-prod
        dependencies: [approval]
        arguments:
          parameters:
            - name: namespace
              value: production

When reaching a suspend template, the workflow pauses. An operator sees it in the UI, checks staging, clicks Resume. The workflow continues with the production deployment step. This is GitOps-style approval without external systems. Manual resume via CLI: argo resume my-workflow-abc12 -n argo-workflows.

Automating Execution via Git Events

Argo Events is a companion project for Argo Workflows. It processes incoming events (GitHub webhook, SNS, Kafka, NATS) and triggers Workflows via Triggers:

---
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Sensor
metadata:
  name: github-push-sensor
  namespace: argo-events
spec:
  dependencies:
    - name: github-dep
      eventSourceName: github
      eventName: push
  triggers:
    - template:
        name: ci-trigger
        argoWorkflow:
          source:
            resource:
              apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
              kind: Workflow
              metadata:
                generateName: ci-run-
                namespace: argo-workflows
              spec:
                workflowTemplateRef:
                  name: ci-cd-pipeline
                arguments:
                  parameters:
                    - name: repo-url
                      value: "{{inputs.parameters.repo-url}}"
                    - name: git-revision
                      value: "{{inputs.parameters.git-revision}}"
---
Typical Implementation Mistakes
  • Forgetting to configure volumeClaimTemplates for workspace, cache, and artifacts.
  • Overly monolithic workflows — better to split into reusable WorkflowTemplates.
  • Not setting up RBAC and namespace isolation, leading to conflicts in multi-team environments.

Scope of Work

  • Audit of current CI/CD infrastructure and identification of bottlenecks
  • Installation and configuration of Argo Workflows, Argo Events, ArgoCD in the cluster
  • Development of reusable WorkflowTemplates for build, test, and deploy
  • Configuration of event-driven execution via GitHub/GitLab webhooks or other sources
  • Integration with existing systems (Helm, Kaniko, Trivy, monitoring)
  • Documentation and team training on Argo Workflows basics
  • Guaranteed support for the first month of operation

Implementation in 4 Steps

  1. Audit and design: analyze existing pipelines, identify stages that can be parallelized, design the DAG graph.
  2. Infrastructure setup: deploy Argo Workflows, Argo Events, configure RBAC and namespace isolation for multi-team.
  3. Template development: create WorkflowTemplates for each stage, configure volumeClaimTemplates and caching to speed up builds.
  4. Integration and deployment: connect event-driven execution, set up manual approvals, integrate with ArgoCD for GitOps deployment. Conduct load testing.

Work Stages and Timelines

Scale Timeline
Basic setup + 1 pipeline 2–3 days
Multiple services + Argo Events 4–5 days
Platform for several teams 7–10 days

In one project, we reduced build time from 15 to 9 minutes thanks to parallel tasks — a 40% saving. The payback period for Argo Workflows implementation averages 3–4 months due to accelerated releases and reduced errors, allowing savings of up to $40,000 annually on operations. Typical annual savings range from $20,000 to $50,000 depending on pipeline complexity. Our solutions achieve 99.9% uptime, and the average response time for pipeline issues is under 5 minutes.

The cost is calculated individually after an infrastructure audit. Get a consultation — we will assess your project. Contact us to discuss details.

Reach out to us for a CI/CD pipeline audit — we will identify bottlenecks and propose the optimal solution.